The question was
straight; the answer infuriating, a labyrinth of generalities. So it
had to be asked again, the minister prevaricated again, so it had to
be asked again.......
No light
forthcoming; the minister wasn’t answering, wasn’t acknowledging
that she wasn’t answering and was, seemingly, hoping nobody would
notice.
Goddammit, stop
talking! Same minister does it all the time. I can’t stand her. And
no, this isn’t a sexist rant, she just happens to be the one this
time, and my head is demanding I offer some resistance.
To my way of
thinking, this is a clear insult; does the minister somehow think
that she has mesmerised us with canny wordplay, that all of us out
here in listener-land are nodding our heads like those dogs that
nodded, years ago, in the back windows of cars; is she so arrogant
that she believes that her evasive handling of the question makes a
good enough answer for a dim-witted population.
Democracy doesn’t
count for much in a fog of obfuscation and lies, yet we tolerate it
every time we allow a politician to use filibustering tactics in an
interview; to talk over or try to drown out an opposing argument;
introduce red herrings e.g. maybe X was corrupt, but don’t forget
forget how well Y was managed. If the supreme power of a state is
invested in its people, it follows that they shouldn’t be stumbling
around in darkness.
Whistle-blowers are
victimised unmercifully in these systems for daring to throw light on
nefarious practices. No matter that they selflessly expose themselves
to this for the common good, no matter that they show levels of
bravery that are admired in other circumstances; the prevailing
darkness suited these politicians, and that’s the wholly all of it.
Nor do cults of
personality support democracy, when all the available light is used
to spotlight a chosen one. Here the message is, keep your eyes on me,
follow me, I am your source of light. And, of course, a spotlight
always deepens the shadow around it.
I don’t buy the notion of western democracy as it’s presented.
Sure, it’s an improvement on most dictatorships, but it doesn’t
confer the freedom it claims to; not as long as public information is
purposely garbled and deceptive, nor as long as advertising campaigns
funded by lobby groups with deep pockets and partisan views are
allowable – advertising is not an open forum – or indeed while
there are systems that are overwhelmingly two party driven, when we
all know that it takes more than two colours to produce white light.
To say I am troubled
by recent trends in politics would be to understate it. It seems to
me that the further we have travelled from the pioneers that founded
our states the more our politicians have become blowers of smoke. I
am afraid that a generation of politicians cleverer than the current
will turn smoke to tar, and light doesn’t penetrate tar.