Is the photography of the victims of war, famine, crime, natural disasters etc. acceptable? The argument, of course, is that it makes the rest of us aware and maybe mobilises our sympathies to the point where we do something about it.
But what about the photographer on the spot, who prioritises the photograph over the victim in a fleeting situation? The media circus attached to certain disasters?
And what about myself who buys the books?
A Brief Note on an Imminent Famine.
Everyone here will starve:
each bone will be a stripe,
each hand a bowl,
each leg a stick.
Then there’ll be the gluttony
of cameras:
our threadbare skin
will be devoured,
our eyes exported
shining like pickles.
No comments:
Post a Comment